How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

General·December 23, 2025·10 sources

The world is proven to be flat

FalseThis claim has been determined to be false based on available evidence.

Analysis

The claim that "the world is proven to be flat" is fundamentally incorrect and contradicts centuries of scientific evidence. The overwhelming consensus among scientists is that the Earth is an oblate spheroid, a conclusion supported by extensive research and observations. The sources provided predominantly highlight the persistence of flat Earth beliefs, often rooted in misinformation and conspiracy theories, rather than scientific fact. For instance, sources like the Wikipedia entry on Flat Earth and articles from Scientific American and Physics World emphasize that flat Earth theories lack credible scientific support and are contrary to established knowledge. While some sources discuss the motivations behind flat Earth beliefs, they do not provide any legitimate evidence supporting the claim that the Earth is flat. Instead, they illustrate the challenges posed by misinformation and the importance of scientific literacy. Overall, the claim is not supported by credible evidence and is clearly refuted by scientific consensus.