Supreme Court just rewrote the constitution to give trump new powers

The claim that the Supreme Court has "rewritten the constitution to give Trump new powers" reflects a significant interpretation of recent rulings that have indeed expanded presidential authority, particularly in the context of lower court limitations. Several sources discuss a ruling in the case of "Trump v. U.S." which purportedly enhances the executive branch's powers, suggesting a shift towards a more monarch-like authority for the president. However, the framing of the claim as a complete rewriting of the Constitution is an exaggeration. The rulings in question are based on interpretations of existing constitutional principles, particularly concerning the separation of powers and the limits of judicial authority. While the decisions have been characterized as a victory for Trump and future presidents, they do not constitute a formal alteration of the Constitution itself. The sources generally agree that the Supreme Court's recent decisions have favored executive power, but they vary in their assessments of the implications and the extent of this shift.