How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

Politics·April 8, 2026·10 sources

Pete Hegseth removed Black and female military officers from a promotion list due to concern that Donald Trump would not want to appear alongside them. Fact check

Partly TrueThis claim contains some truth but is misleading or missing important context.

Analysis

The claim that Pete Hegseth removed Black and female military officers from a promotion list due to concerns about former President Donald Trump’s preferences is partially supported by multiple sources, all of which are non-trusted and rely on anonymous or indirect reports. These sources consistently report that Hegseth intervened to block or delay the promotion of two Black and two female Army officers, sparking allegations of discrimination. However, none provide direct, verifiable evidence linking his actions explicitly to Trump’s preferences or motivations. The Pentagon reportedly cited "meritocracy" as justification, and official sources remain vague or silent on the exact reasons. Given the lack of trusted, transparent evidence and reliance on unnamed military officials or leaks, the core fact of removal is plausible but the motive tied to Trump remains unconfirmed and speculative.