How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

Politics·February 11, 2026·10 sources

Jeffrey Epstein lawyer says there’s nothing on Trump’s

Partly TrueThis claim contains some truth but is misleading or missing important context.

Analysis

The claim that Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer stated there is “nothing on Trump” is partially supported but remains unconfirmed due to the lack of trusted, direct evidence. The available sources are all from non-trusted outlets and provide fragmented, sometimes contradictory information about the release and content of Epstein files, with some references to statements by Todd Blanche, Trump’s personal lawyer, denying protective measures or hidden materials related to Trump. However, these sources also mention the existence of notes or references to Trump in Epstein-related documents, suggesting that while no incriminating evidence may have been found or disclosed by Epstein’s lawyer, the files are extensive and complex. The absence of reliable, authoritative sources and the presence of political and media disputes around the files prevent a definitive conclusion. Thus, the claim holds some merit but cannot be fully confirmed as true or false.