How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

General·March 14, 2026·10 sources

Is Pam Bondi behind a rule to stop state Bar Association from investigate investigating misconduct and Pennine DOjlawyers?

Partly TrueThis claim contains some truth but is misleading or missing important context.

Analysis

The claim that Pam Bondi is behind a rule to stop state Bar Associations from investigating misconduct by DOJ lawyers is partially supported by multiple sources, though all are from non-trusted outlets and lack official confirmation. Several reports from early 2026 describe a proposed regulation or effort linked to Bondi and the Trump DOJ aimed at limiting state bar ethics investigations into Department of Justice attorneys. These sources suggest Bondi’s involvement in attempts to exempt DOJ lawyers from normal disciplinary oversight, but concrete evidence directly attributing the rule solely to her or confirming its official adoption is missing. Additionally, some sources mention calls for investigations into Bondi herself, indicating controversy around her role. The absence of trusted, independent confirmation and reliance on politically charged or speculative reports means the claim cannot be fully verified, but there is a consistent narrative that she played a role in efforts to curtail state bar oversight of DOJ lawyers.