How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

Politics·February 18, 2026·11 sources

Epstein file's made trump rich and horrible behaviour

Partly TrueThis claim contains some truth but is misleading or missing important context.

Analysis

The claim that "Epstein files made Trump rich and horrible behaviour" is only partially supported by the available sources, all of which are non-trusted and thus require cautious interpretation. The sources suggest a complex relationship between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, including allegations that Trump was aware of Epstein’s conduct and that Epstein sought to impress Trump with displays of wealth. However, there is no conclusive evidence that the Epstein files directly made Trump rich, nor is there verified proof from these sources that Epstein’s files alone explain or caused Trump’s alleged "horrible behaviour." While some sources imply Trump’s knowledge or association with Epstein’s misconduct, definitive links to Trump’s wealth or personal behaviour remain unsubstantiated or speculative. The lack of trusted, corroborated evidence and the presence of mostly speculative or politically charged reporting means the claim cannot be fully confirmed.