How does the AI Fact Checker work?

The AI Fact Checker analyzes claims using advanced AI technology to verify information against trusted sources like BBC, Reuters, AP, and Snopes. It provides verdicts (True, Partly True, or False) in under 20 seconds with complete transparency about sources and methodology.

Is the AI Fact Checker free to use?

Yes, the AI Fact Checker app is completely free to download and use on both iOS and Android devices.

What languages does the app support?

The AI Fact Checker currently supports English, German, Dutch, French, Spanish, and Italian, with more languages planned for future releases.

How accurate is the AI Fact Checker?

The AI Fact Checker maintains a 98% accuracy rate by cross-referencing multiple trusted sources and using transparent methodology. All verdicts include source citations and bias indicators for full transparency.

Does the app protect my privacy?

Yes, privacy is a core principle. Your searches are completely private, and we never share or sell your data to third parties.

World·March 2, 2026·19 sources

Donald Trump issued a warning about Iran's military threats, stating they would face unprecedented force if they acted on those threats.

Partly TrueThis claim contains some truth but is misleading or missing important context.

Analysis

The claim that Donald Trump issued a warning about Iran's military threats, stating they would face unprecedented force if they acted on those threats, is partially supported by the available sources. Several sources mention Trump's rhetoric involving strong military responses to Iran, including references to unprecedented force or massive operations. However, all sources are from non-trusted outlets with limited direct quotations or official statements, and some focus on related but distinct events such as strikes on Venezuela or intelligence assessments. The lack of trusted, direct evidence from official statements or reputable media means the claim cannot be fully confirmed. It is plausible that Trump made such warnings given his historical posture on Iran, but the evidence is insufficiently robust and relies heavily on secondary or ambiguous reports.